Seleziona una pagina

Predicting soil health to protect ecosystems

PHISHES – PHysically-Based Integrated Soil HEalth Simulation Platform is a four-year European Research and Innovation Action project that aims to bridge the missing link between data on soil health and actions for the safeguard of soils.
It started on 1 September 2024 and runs for 48 months.

Data and Action for Soil Health

PHISHES seeks to bridge the gap between soil health data and actions, providing much-needed predictive capability in terms of the consequences of actions on the provision of soil functions and associated ecosystem services, taking into account soil use, soil contamination and various drivers such as climate change.

At the heart of PHISHES is the development of a Digital Platform containing workflows and tools quantifying the effect of management actions on the environment. The tools will be combinations of data processing procedures and further developed modules on top of existing cutting-edge numerical models, such as the distributed hydrological system MIKE SHE and the DAISY agro-ecological model of the soil-plant-atmosphere system.

The gap between science and policy is bridged in practice by a Decision Support System that will display the concrete findings of the PHISHES project and actionable recommendations for policy affecting soil health.

A Key Scientific Question

The core scientific challenge addressed by PHISHES is: “How do soil use and soil contamination influence soil functions and associated ecosystem services, in the presence of major drivers such as climate change, and how can we predict the impacts of mitigation and adaptation measures?”.

By providing quantitative predictive tools the project will enable stakeholders and decision makers to evaluate the effects of possible actions such as changed agricultural practices, land restoration, or pollution mitigation measures, with the goal of preserving soil health and improve soil function impacts on associated ecosystem services. Indeed, the results of the scenario simulations generated by the PHISHES Digital Platform will be translated into policy recommendations aimed at promoting soil health, enhancing ecosystem services, and mitigating the effects of contamination and climate change.

Real-Life Case Studies

To ensure practical application and relevance, PHISHES modelling results are applied and tested by four case studies across Europe, focusing on diverse environmental challenges:

  • The Zelivka River Basin in the Czech Republic, analysing soil management’s influence on drinking water quality at catchment scale.
  • The Koprzywianka River in Poland, covering water withdrawals / irrigation on agricultural land.
  • The Airport in Örnsköldsvik, Sweden, looking at efficiency of mitigation measures of PFAS contamination at sub catchment scale.
  • The Rotterdam Urban Area in the Netherlands, evaluating the use of green infrastructure to improve resilience and sustainability of urban environments.

Additionally, a Soil Laboratory in France will examine the fate and transport of PFAS from soil to groundwater under controlled conditions.

By integrating cutting-edge models and real-world case studies, the PHISHES project will provide valuable insights into sustainable soil management. Moreover, with its focus on translating scientific findings into actionable recommendations, PHISHES represents a significant advance in the preservation of soil health and the sustainability of ecosystem services.

 

PHISHES partners

PHISHES brings together nine expert partners from across Europe, encompassing soil science, hydrology, and policy-making.

DHI, Denmark (Coordinator)
BRGM – French Geological Survey, France
University of Copenhagen, Denmark
Deltares, Netherlands
Swedish Geotechnical Institute, Sweden
German Environment Agency, Germany
CzechGlobe, Czech Republic
Warsaw University of Life Sciences, Poland
T6 Ecosystems Srl, Italy

Funded by the European Union. Views and opinions expressed are however those of the author(s) only and do not necessarily reflect those of the European Union or the European Research Executive Agency (REA). Neither the European Union nor the granting authority can be held responsible for them.